Fall Semester is the Red Zone

by Kyra Brown, Red Zone Awareness Ambassador

Did you know that during the Fall semester, the rate of someone being sexually assaulted on campus skyrockets? This period is known as the Red Zone, and it is important to be aware of what this means if you are a college student. From the start of the fall semester until around Thanksgiving break, college students—particularly first-year women—are at a much higher risk of sexual assault. Most of these incidents occur during Halloween weekend. Freshmen are particularly vulnerable because they have been thrust into a new environment and may not know how to navigate out of bad situations. The Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault (LaFASA) helps those who have experienced trauma, and it is their mission to bring healing and stop sexual assault altogether.

Sexual assault on campus is not made up of random isolated incidents. Too many students believe that if it doesn’t affect them, then it is not a problem. This is far from the case. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 1 in 3 women has experienced some form of sexual assault. This is a drastic issue that cannot be ignored. College students must know that this issue impacts them, even if indirectly. No college is immune to campus-related sexual assault.

Sexual assault is a crime and everyone, man or woman, should be aware of the serious effects that it has on survivors. Survivors should know that there are resources available to help them navigate their journey in the aftermath. LaFASA’s website provides access to numbers that you can text and call to speak to someone about your experiences. If you don’t feel comfortable speaking to someone over the phone, find someone you trust to confide in. It does not matter how you get help…you can take back control of your life when you choose to seek help.

In conclusion, sexual assault should not be discounted or taken lightly. It is a problem that affects a countless number of people every year, especially on college campuses. LaFASA works tirelessly to make sure that these numbers do not rise and victims get the help you can need. To contact LaFASA, visit the website https://www.lafasa.org or call 225-372-8995.

Exploring the issues of Black women’s bodily autonomy

by DiQuisha Harbor, Xavier University student
2024 LaFASA Red Zone Awareness Ambassador

The systemic denial of Black women’s bodily autonomy is deeply rooted in the intersecting forces of racism, sexism, and colonial legacies, which continue to create the need for rectitude in healthcare, agency, and the societal value of Black women’s bodies. This essay seeks to explore these issues and advocate for meaningful change by examining historical and contemporary systems of oppression. I will argue that three critical theories of Blackness—Afro-pessimism, intersectionality, and womanist theory—explain how these forces work together to marginalize Black women, particularly in moments of crisis. These frameworks reveal that the neglect and exploitation of Black women in medical research, public health, and daily life are not isolated incidents, but interconnected practices rooted in history and perpetuated by systemic structures. This argument is grounded in the understanding that anti-Blackness, sexism, and colonial legacies converge to erase Black women’s voices and needs. To demonstrate this, I will discuss (1) the history of medical exploitation of Black women, with a focus on unethical practices such as those conducted by J. Marion Sims, (2) the systemic exclusion of Black women from public health decision-making, as seen in the perpetuation of health disparities during crises, and (3) the ongoing dismissal of Black women’s pain and autonomy in modern healthcare systems, where bias and racism persist. In addition to analyzing these systems, I will introduce a concept I call embodied resilience, which highlights how Black women resist these oppressive structures by reclaiming their bodies, narratives, and health practices. This resilience reflects the strength and agency of Black women in the face of systemic devaluation and injustice. By addressing these issues, this essay will offer a deeper understanding of how overlapping systems of oppression continue to deny Black women control over their bodies. It will also emphasize the importance of centering Black women’s voices in efforts to reimagine quality healthcare and public policy. Ultimately, this essay aims to advocate for practical strategies to dismantle these systems and amplify Black women’s autonomy and agency in the fight against sexual violence and systemic inequalities.
The historical exploitation of Black women in medical research serves as a foundation for understanding how their bodily autonomy has been systematically undermined. Throughout history, Black women’s bodies have been subjected to unethical experiments that dehumanized them while advancing medical science for others. One of the most well-known examples is the work of Dr. J. Marion Sims, often referred to as the “father of modern gynecology,” who conducted invasive surgical experiments on enslaved Black women without anesthesia. As documented by Harriet A. Washington in Medical Apartheid, “Sims’s practice of experimenting on enslaved women and performing multiple operations on the same women, often without their consent, demonstrated his disregard for their humanity” (Washington, 2006, p. 66). This quote underscores the systemic abuse and exploitation of Black women’s bodies in the name of medical progress.
While Sims’s work laid the groundwork for gynecology, it did so at the expense of enslaved Black women, who endured immense suffering and had no agency in their own care. This historical context highlights the roots of mistrust that many Black women feel toward the healthcare system today. It also demonstrates how medical research has perpetuated a legacy of valuing Black women as objects of study rather than as autonomous individuals deserving of dignity and respect. Understanding this exploitation is essential for addressing the modern-day injustices that stem from these practices, leading to a broader conversation about the systemic devaluation of Black women’s autonomy. The systemic marginalization of Black women in public health is rooted in anti-Black racism, which perpetuates health disparities and disproportionately harms their wellbeing. This intersection of racism and sexism creates structural barriers that prevent Black women from receiving unbiased healthcare, particularly in reproductive health and during public health crises. In Sickening: Anti-Black Racism and Health Disparities in the United States, Anne Pollock explains, “Anti-Black racism is not just an incidental aspect of health disparities; it is foundational to the systems that produce them” (Pollock, 2021, p. 12). This quote emphasizes that the difference in treatment in healthcare are not accidental but deeply embedded in the systems designed to uphold racial hierarchies. For Black women, these disparities manifest in higher rates of maternal mortality, poor access to reproductive health services, and the consistent dismissal of their pain and concerns by medical professionals. These systemic issues are exacerbated during public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where Black women have faced disproportionate harm due to pre-existing biases in access to healthcare and economic resources. This structural neglect reflects a long history of devaluing Black women’s health and autonomy, leaving them vulnerable to compounded harm. Addressing these disparities requires a fundamental shift in how healthcare systems prioritize Black women’s needs and voices. By confronting the anti-Black racism at the core of these biases, public health systems can begin to create more s and supportive environments. This discussion transitions to examining how Black women resist these systemic barriers through resilience and advocacy.
Black women’s pain and autonomy are consistently dismissed in healthcare systems, leading to serious health disparities, particularly during pregnancy and childbirth. This neglect is a direct result of systemic biases and societal structures that disproportionately harm Black women, especially in areas with limited access to maternity care. In Maternity Care Deserts and Pregnancy-Associated Mortality in Louisiana, Wallace et al. state, “Counties with limited or no access to maternity care services experience higher rates of pregnancy-associated mortality, and these disparities are particularly severe for Black women” (Wallace et al., 2020, p. 7). This quote highlights how the lack of accessible maternity care contributes to higher maternal mortality rates for Black women, underscoring the structural racism embedded in healthcare systems. These disparities are not just about location but are tied to a long history of neglecting Black women’s health needs. When Black women are denied proper maternity care, it not only puts their physical health at risk but also strips them of their sense of control and dignity during one of the most critical times in their lives. This disregard perpetuates a cycle of harm where Black women face preventable complications due to systemic failures in healthcare. This reality makes it clear that healthcare systems must be reformed to provide Black women with fair, respectful, and accessible care. Policies must prioritize their needs and experiences to break down the structural barriers that contribute to these disparities. This discussion sets the stage for examining how Black women have resisted these systems and fought to reclaim their autonomy through practices of resilience, which will be explored in the concept of embodied resilience. Despite the systemic oppression Black women face in healthcare, many resist these forces through what I call embodied resilience-the process of reclaiming their bodies, health, and narratives in the face of structural biases. This concept aligns with the mission of organizations like LAFASA (Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault), which work to amplify the voices of marginalized communities and advocate for systemic change to protect bodily autonomy and agency. Embodied resilience is critical in addressing the impact of racism in healthcare, where Black women are often dismissed, ignored, or mistreated. As stated in Confronting Racism in Health Care: Moving From Proclamations to New Practice, “True reform requires centering the voices of those most affected by racism and fostering their leadership in shaping [fair] care systems” (Hardeman et al., 2020, p. 3). This quote emphasizes the importance of empowering Black women to lead and advocate for themselves within a system that has historically marginalized them. Embodied resilience takes many forms, from demanding informed consent and seeking culturally competent care to building community support networks that prioritize Black women’s health and autonomy. These actions are not only personal acts of resistance but also collective challenges to the structures that perpetuate biases. By reclaiming their autonomy, Black women are reshaping how their bodies and health are understood and valued. This theory highlights the transformative potential of centering Black women’s voices, as organizations like LAFASA work to dismantle systems of oppression and build a framework of fairness and justice. Embodied resilience paves the way for systemic changes that prioritize the dignity and autonomy of all women, particularly those who have been historically silenced.
The systemic denial of Black women’s bodily autonomy, rooted in racism, sexism, and colonial legacies, continues to perpetuate biases in healthcare and undermine their agency. These injustices—visible in the historical exploitation of Black women, their exclusion from public health decisions, and the dismissal of their pain—demand urgent action. LAFASA (Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault) is leading the fight against oppression, and its mission is amplified by the work of dedicated advocates. As a 2024 Red Zone Awareness Ambassador for LAFASA on Xavier’s campus, I’ve seen firsthand the importance of engaging students, faculty, and the wider community in discussions about biases and bodily autonomy. Xavier University, with its legacy of fostering social justice and producing leaders in healthcare and advocacy, provides a powerful platform for collaboration. Together, LAFASA and Xavier can address systemic barriers and inspire meaningful change. The need for these efforts is clear. As stated in Confronting Racism in Health Care: Moving From Proclamations to New Practice, “Racism is deeply embedded in healthcare systems, resulting in significant disparities that harm marginalized communities” (Hardeman et al., 2020, p. 3). These disparities can only be dismantled through focused action and collaborative advocacy. By supporting LAFASA’s programs and strengthening partnerships with institutions like Xavier University, we can amplify Black women’s voices, challenge oppressive systems, and ensure that all women have access to dignity and respect. Together, through education, advocacy, and empowerment, we can build a future where justice and bodily autonomy are universal. The work of LAFASA, combined with initiatives on campuses like Xavier, offers a path forward—and we invite you to join us in this vital mission.

Congratulations to RPE Programs on their Greening/Environmental Change Projects!

There are six member centers who receive federal Rape Prevention Education (RPE) funding through a contract with LaFASA via the state health department. These centers work to prevent sexual violence from multiple angles, including increasing individual skills for healthy relationships and bystander intervention, change social norms around consent and masculinity, increase opportunities for women and marginalized communities, and create protective environments through policy change or changing the settings in which people live, work, and play. 

In the last year, two member centers have achieved success in their greening/environmental change work! Greening is a strategy used to modify the physical and social environment, to create community-level protective factors that can stop multiple forms of violence. When people feel connected, valued, and heard by their community, it makes real change.

In Thibodaux, the Haven started a Greening Task Force that worked together to identify a municipal-owned lot that would be a good candidate for a new park. They distributed a survey to community members about their hopes for a park, and community members emphasized the use of the space for youth and for job fairs and other resources. The Task Force met with the Mayor of Thibodaux and the city’s Special Projects and Economic Development Director in August to finalize the proposal for the use of the space. The city agreed to fund the Greening Task Force’s proposal for the creation of this park in 2025.

In Bogalusa, the Prevention Coordinator at ADAPT created a survey to understand community needs, which found that a streetlight had been broken for a long time. This impacted residents and their safety in an area that has high levels of foot traffic from residents who walk to school, work, and errands. The Prevention Coordinator took these concerns to the city councilwoman, Ms. Gloria Kates. In the meeting, ADAPT made the case that these neighbors’ safety concerns are important ones, and that when residents feel heard by those in power and connected to each other, it creates safer and more cohesive communities. This city councilwoman took ADAPT’s concerns (on behalf of the neighborhood) to the utility company. After the meeting between the utility company and Councilwoman Kates, the streetlight was fixed.

Defining the world we want to live in depends on us and the actions we take. Positive actions add up to change and better and safer communities. We applaud the diligence and determination of these centers and allies.

Creating Safe Areas is a Big Issue towards Ending Sexual Assault

As college students, the topic of establishing safe environments is not just relevant, but essential in ending sexual violence. The college setting is a microcosm of the larger community and effectively serves as a sample of character and behavior. While unacceptable actions of individuals cannot be side-stepped, it’s important to understand within the scope of necessary changes to end sexual violence, effective prevention efforts must also incorporate a community-level strategy that addresses on and off-campus social spaces.

According to the CDC, evidence-based community-level strategies to create safe spaces include three approaches.

One: Improving safety and monitoring in schools
 These approaches monitor and modify physical and social characteristics of the school environment by addressing areas where students feel less safe, to identify safe spaces and staff support for students. This includes alternative and outside-the-box approaches such as tutoring to empower fellow students and being a “big buddy” to those who are vulnerable. Volunteering with empathetic attitudes, advocating for a reliable and on-time student transit system, and being actively involved in changing social norms fit into the realm of improving safety on and around campuses, also.

Two: Establishing and consistently applying workplace policies 
Working at businesses on campuses or those surrounding campuses is a huge part of student life. When employees and managers know what is mutually expected of them, and respect standards of behavior, workplace bullying and sexual harassment can be prevented. Even if you aren’t employed by these businesses, supporting businesses that embrace these policies contribute to the overall well-being of the community.

Three: Addressing community-level risks through environmental approaches
These strategies focus on various elements of neighborhoods and community settings, including the modification, implementation, or enforcement of laws, regulations, or organizational policies. This can involve urging restaurants and bars to adopt stringent alcohol policies, encouraging bars to train all staff, or altering the physical environment, such as making sure parking lots are well-lit. Community-level environmental approaches hold significant potential for influencing sexual violence outcomes on a population scale, often with minimal implementation costs. 

Students possess greater power to combat sexual violence than they often realize. Broader changes can contribute to an overall reduction in crime and a decrease in power-based violence. Communities that practice respect tend to experience a reduction in crime rates, including incidents of sexual assault. Though the red zone time frame will be ending in November, it is not a time to stop being vigilant when it comes to sexual assault. We invite students to assess what they can do to promote community level well-being and support any efforts taken.

Adding Substance to “If you see something, say something”

by Kelli Knight

If you see something, say something. What does that mean to you? Do you even know what to look for to say something? That has been a “catch phrase” for years, and is used for all types of criminal activity. In my opinion, unless clear red flags are attached to an action, such as watching someone testing multiple car door handles in a parking lot or watching someone get separated by a person who has said or shown intentions to be predatory, the phrase can be unspecific and the impact behind it watered down. To me, this is especially true when it comes to human trafficking. 

As you travel along Louisiana’s interstate systems, there are billboards that read, “If you see something, say something,” with no other message or information other than, “Stop Human Trafficking.” How many people actually know what signs or actions are associated with human trafficking? Could this campaign be more effective? For many advocates working with survivors who have been in oppressive relationships and experienced trauma, it’s not a difficult task to recognize signs, as many cases may have cross-over indicators. But, how many people see something that could be an actual red flag, but it goes unnoticed because they don’t realize it’s not normal or they are witnessing a victim unable to flee? How many people think that human trafficking is remote or random and couldn’t possibly be what they are witnessing? As you’ll see, even people in professional positions, can miss the signs.

The state of Louisiana has been gathering data and building resources in regards to human trafficking and in the past several years established the Office of Human Trafficking Prevention which instituted The Human Trafficking Prevention Resource Center. Many are unaware of the excellent website they built which posts valuable and UP-TO-DATE data specific to Louisiana so that visitors can see how prevalent human trafficking is, well, as much as can be determined. Much like sexual assault, it’s assumed that there is under reporting and the number of victims is higher than data reflects. However, the website is very well done and gives a good picture of what modern slavery looks like parish to parish and person to person. They also provide links to other human trafficking resources. The information in this blog comes from their website.

While labor trafficking is an issue, in Louisiana sex trafficking is more commonly seen by more than 70 percent, which is why LaFASA and statewide crisis centers are involved.
First of all, let’s get rid of misconceptions and bust some myths.
Myths vs. Reality
Human Trafficking Only Happens In Other Countries
Reality: Human trafficking can happen in any community, anywhere around the world. In 2021, Louisiana service providers reported 932 instances of confirmed and suspected human trafficking across urban and rural parishes in our state.

Sex trafficking only happens to women or girls.
Reality: Men and boys experience human trafficking too. In 2022, 10% of reported victims in Louisiana identified as male.

Movement is required for trafficking to occur.
Reality: The crime of human trafficking does not require any movement or transporting across state or national borders.

Traffickers are always strangers.
Reality: Many survivors are groomed by people they know, such as romantic partners, family members, and spouses.

Trafficking does not happen in the home.
Reality: Human trafficking can happen in the home such as by family members or friends.

Victim behavior causes trafficking.
Reality: Victims and survivors of human trafficking are groomed and recruited for victimization. Initial consent to commercial sex or labor is not relevant when force, fraud, or coercion is present or the individual is a minor engaging in commercial sex.

Power is always maintained through drugs or physical force.
Reality: Traffickers use many tactics to recruit and keep their victims. Physical force and forced drug use are some ways traffickers maintain power, but not always. Other strong tactics include psychological manipulation, threats of violence, isolation, and economic dependency.

Victims are locked away by their trafficker. 
Reality: Up to 88% of victims report interacting with a professional during their trafficking experience who missed the chance to identify and help them.

‍The last myth is very upsetting knowing that many victims could have been helped. If we want to consider ourselves aware enough to say something, then we must first of all know what is considered conspicuous activity. So, below are some indicators and “red flags” that will be helpful in understanding just what to look for to keep victims from falling through the cracks. Understand that occurrences aren’t always single or random, but oftentimes are occasions where places are frequented, such as a convenience store or a fast food restaurant. And, signals don’t just show as a visual association, but also as audibles, such as how someone is being talked to or directed. 

Indicators:
The person is disoriented, confused, or showing signs of mental or physical abuse.
The person cannot freely contact friends or family.
The person is fearful, timid, or overly submissive.
The person was forced to perform commercial sexual acts.
There is evidence of a sexually explicit online advertisement.
The person was recruited for a job, but was forced to engage in work without compensation.
The person does not have freedom of movement.
The person lacks personal possessions such as identification or money and appears not to have a stable living situation.
The person is often in the company of someone to whom he or she defers to speak on his or her behalf.
The person is closely monitored at all times.
A minor has stopped attending school.
A person has bruises in various stages of healing.
There is a lack of suitable or stable living conditions.
The person doesn’t have personal possessions.

Not all indicators exist in every human trafficking situation, and the presence or absence of any of the indicators isn’t proof that there is trafficking. Also, as I mentioned before, many of these indicators cross-over into other oppressive situations and relationships. However, if you see someone who is experiencing one or more these indicators, regardless of whether it falls under human trafficking or domestic/family violence, it’s great to be aware enough to bring attention to someone who is potentially being victimized under any type of circumstance. 

If we talk about these myths, indicators, and websites, perhaps the meaning of that phrase, “If you see something, say something,” can have more substance. The campaign can be more effective and you or someone you know can be the person who notices enough to save a life.